Watchmen
Reviews 1 to 15 of 15
-
4.2 out of five for Watchmen
def. read the comic first, but it was a good adaptation for the most part!
-
4.0 out of five for Watchmen
alright, some dodgy acting, but visually very good&entertaining. music was excellent, too. could easily have been 5h long.
-
4.0 out of five for Watchmen
really good... but I probably should have read the comic first
-
4.0 out of five for Watchmen
Really enjoyed it, despite not having read the book. Couple of niggles, but well worth three hours of Imax.
-
4.0 out of five for Watchmen
Deeply flawed - neither pandering to the fanboy or the normal punter - but still really good and worth seeing.
-
4.5 out of five for Watchmen
Dark and morally ambiguous. Love the paranoid, uchronic world. Very long but very good.
-
2.5 out of five for Watchmen
And that was what all the hype was all about? Boring and 2 hours too long. Also - no acting skills required apparently.
-
4.0 out of five for Watchmen
Another decent comic to movie adaption. Really dark and brutal. Definately worth a watch.
-
4.0 out of five for Watchmen
Very cleverly made and mostly worth seeing.
-
3.9 out of five for Watchmen
Decent reinterpretation, with lots of exposition removed and a new ending. Read the book, then watch the film.
-
4.0 out of five for Watchmen
Very true to the comic, with minor acting issues. Exactly what I thought it would be and ultimately worth the wait.
-
3.0 out of five for Watchmen
Way overrated! Very good special effects, alot of story to fit into small space of time, nothing special
-
2.0 out of five for Watchmen
A bit boring
-
3.5 out of five for Watchmen
Over hyped, a tad arrogant & much stylised it may be, but beyond that it has to be said it's a smart story & well told.
-
4.0 out of five for Watchmen
not as good as the hype made it to be but still very enjoyable. see it!
Got something to add? Review this yourself on Twitter.
Movie
| bad | average | good |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | 11 |
This appears to be a movie but identifying things automatically is less of a science and more of an art.
Is this in the wrong category? Care to correct it through Twitter.